Prayer Time Secret Relationship With The Human Body

Each transition time of prayer actually showed a change of this nature which may be measured and perceived through the natural color changes. For example, at the dawn of time nature is in light blue color spectrum along with the frequency of thyroid which affects the body's metabolism system. 

So in light blue or the dawn of time has a secret related to the bidder / provision and communication. They are often left behind or missed time Subuhnya repeated times, over time will deal with communication problems and sustenance. 

This natural energy kerana namely light blue could not be absorbed by the thyroid which must apply in a state of spirit and body bercantum (simultaneity of space and time) - in other words keep erties than sleep. Here we can also lever will rahsia ordered early prayer time. 

Fajr azan beginning course, natural forces at that time located at the optimum stage.This power will be absorbed by the body through the concept of resonant at the time of bowing and prostration. So those who missed Subuhnya really have got the power no longer optimum. 

Natural color so changed to green color (isyraq & Duha) and then the color yellow signifies the entrance time Zohor. The spectrum of colors at this time along with the frequency of stomach and liver associated with the system penghadaman. This yellow color has a secret related to the fun. So they are always out or missed Zuhurnya multiple times in his life will face problems in the stomach and lost cerianya nature. 

Then the natural color will change to the color orange, yiaitu Asar entrance time in which the spectrum of colors at this time along with the frequency of prostate, uterus, ovaries and testes that merangkumi reproductive system. The secret of creativity is the color orange. People who are often left behind Asar will lose power more creativity and more unfortunate if at the time ni Asar someone's body and spirit are separate. And do not forget, the power at the time of Asar ni so required by our reproductive organs 

By the time of Maghrib, natural color changed to red and at this time we are often advised by elderly people for not being outside the home. This kerana color spectrum at this time the frequency approached the jinn and demons (infra-red) and this means the jinn and the devil is very powerful when they kerana resonant with nature. Those who are on the way too-elegant seelok stop first at this time (Maghrib prayer before la.) Kerana lot of interference (pembelauan) prevailing at this time which may confuse our eyes. Secrets of the Maghrib or red color is the belief, at a frequency of muscle, nerve and bone. 

If the entry Isyak time, natural changes to the color of Indigo and so entered the phase of Darkness. This saves time Isyak rahsia tranquility and peace in which the frequency same convoy system of the brain. They are often missed Isyaknya will always be in anxiety. Nature is now in darkness and in fact, this is the time to sleep in Islam. Sleep at this time are called delta sleep in which the whole body system is in kerehatan. 

After midnight, the first natural shine back with white, pink and purple etc. It is the same where the frequency of the pineal gland, pituitary, thalamus and hypothalamus. The body should rise again at this time and in Islam this time called Qiamullail. 

That in brief prayer time relationship with the human body. Man has indeed been aware of the importance of this nature and this is the factor causing the emergence of a variety of meditation are created like tai chi, qi-gong and so forth. Everything is created to absorb the forces of nature into the body system. 

And we as Muslims should be grateful kerana Shari'a has been blessed with prayers by God Almighty without the need to consider how we want to absorb this nature through a variety of techniques which began to grow earlier. The essence is supposed to awaken us pray that Allah requires of his servants upon the nature of His gracious and merciful as the creator because He knows His servants is very-very need it. 

It is very unfortunate one for the collection of human beings is very negligent in keeping solatnya. Everything in nature is to benefit all sentient creatures.

Earth From Space: Amazing Photos by Astronaut Ron Garan

Astronaut Ron Garan with booster for "Yuri Gagarin" Soyuz spacecraft

NASA astronaut Ron Garan poses in front of the booster for the "Yuri Gagarin" Soyuz spacecraft that will carry him and two Russian cosmonauts to the International Space Station.

Eyes on New Zealand

This photo of New Zealand from space was taken by NASA astronaut Ron Garan, who has been blogging about the planet's beauty on his website Fragile Oasis. This image, taken on April 15, 2011, was Garan's first photo sent via Twitter from the International Space Station.

Spacecraft With a View

Two Russian spacecraft add perspective to this photo of Earth taken by NASA astronaut Ron Garan on the International Space Station on April 17, 2011 during the Expedition 27 mission. The photo shows the Catamarca region of Argentina.

Argentina Down Below

This stunning photo of the Catamarca region of Argentina was taken on April 17, 2011 by NASA astronaut Ron Garan through a window on the International Space Station, 220 miles above Earth.

San Francisco Sunrise

NASA astronaut Ron Garan snapped this photo of San Francisco, Calif., on April 17, 2011 while flying aboard the International Space Station during the Expedition 27 mission. On the horizon, the bright blue glow – called airglow – shines just before sunrise over the Golden State. A bright planet is also visible.

中, 식품첨가제 151종 사용 및 남용금지

중대 식품안전 범죄엔 `사형' 

(베이징=연합뉴스) 신삼호 특파원 = 중국 당국은 23일 식품안전을 강화하기 위해 지난 9년간 총 151종의 식품 첨가물에 대해 사용 또는 남용을 금지해왔다고 밝혔다.

중국 국무원 식품약품감독관리국은 이중 47종은 첨가 자체가 금지된 것이라며 인체의 건강을 위협하는 독성물질이나 유해물질을 식품에 첨가하면 최고 사형까지 받을 수 있도록 식품안전 사범에 대한 처벌을 강화했다고 덧붙였다고 신화통신이 전했다.

중국 당국은 식품안전을 강화하고 식품 생산 및 판매업자들을 계도하기 위해 사용 또는 남용 금지된 첨가제 목록을 정부 웹사이트에 개재해 왔다.

위생부는 지난 2008년부터 남용이 금지된 식품 첨가물을 게재했으며 새로 적발된 것들을 계속 추가해 왔다.

농업부도 2002년부터 가축사료나 식품, 음료수에 사용이 금지된 물질을 웹사이트에 올렸다.

식품 사용이 금지된 대표적 물질은 멜라민, 가죽 가수분해 단백질, 공업용 색소, 천식약품 원료인 렉토파민 등이다.

중국은 식품안전 문제가 계속 불거지자 불량식품 단속 강화를 천명하고 제재강도를 높이겠다고 엄포를 놓는 등 불량식품과의 전쟁을 벌이고 있다.

원자바오(溫家寶) 총리는 지난 14일 좌담회에서 "식품 부정사건은 중국 사회에서 윤리와 신용 문제가 얼마나 심각한지를 잘 보여준다"고 통탄하고 "이를 개선하지 않으면 진정한 강국이 될 수 없다"고 강조했다.

리커창(李克强) 부총리 겸 식품안전위원회 주임은 22일 식품 안전을 주제로 한 전국 화상회의에서 "결연한 태도와 단호한 조치로 더욱 노력을 기울여 식품에 불법 첨가물을 넣는 행위를 색출해내야 한다"고 지적했다.

최근 중국에서는 금지 약물인 클레부테롤과 렉토파민을 섞은 사료를 먹인 `유독돼지', 색소를 넣어 만든 '염색 만두', 유독성 유황으로 훈제한 생강, 아질산나트륨 등 유해 첨가제를 넣은 콩나물 등이 잇따라 적발돼 충격을 주고 있다.


<뉴스의 새 시대, 연합뉴스 Live> <모바일 애플리케이션> <포토 매거진>

<저작권자(c)연합뉴스. 무단전재-재배포금지.>

Ice Lake Found on Mars

The European Space Agency's (ESA) Mars Express has snapped an image of a modest ice lake on the Red Planet.

The frozen patch of water ice is tucked away in an unnamed impact crater. The feature is located on Vastitas Borealis, a broad plain that covers much of the far northern latitudes.

The crater is 22 miles (35 kilometers) wide and has a maximum depth of roughly 1.2 miles (2 kilometers) beneath the crater rim.

The ice patch is present all year round, as the temperature and pressure are not high enough to allow the frozen water to escape into the atmosphere.

The poles on Mars are known to contain large quantities of water ice. At the south pole, the water ice is covered by carbon dioxide ice, commonly called dry ice. There is also ample water ice beneath the surface of Mars.

But it is not so common to see isolated patches of water ice away from the poles.

Faint traces of water ice are also visible along the rim of the crater and on the crater walls, ESA officials said. The absence of ice along the north-west rim and walls may occur because this area receives more sunlight due to the Sun's orientation.

A portion of a patch of underlying dunes is visible at one edge of the ice lake.

Colors in the High Resolution Stereo Camera (HRSC) image are very close to natural, but the vertical relief is exaggerated three times, officials said.

Mars Express reached Mars and swung into orbit on Dec. 25, 2003.

Earlier this year, ESA scientists said subsurface ice they detected on Mars could provide habitats for life. But so far, there is no convincing evidence for martian biology.

E.T., Call Us Back! Making the Case for Alien Life

There's no good evidence to date that life exists, or ever has existed, on worlds beyond the Earth — so it might seem odd that the field of science known as astrobiology is booming. Over the past decade or so, hundreds of biologists, geologists, chemists and astronomers have conducted research and attended conferences on astrobiology around the world, and NASA even has an Astrobiology Institute at its Ames Research Center in California.

That's because there's plenty to think about before we actually find alien life. What form, for example, is it likely to take? Where should we be looking, and how? How did life arise on Earth — was it pretty much inevitable, given the right conditions, or was it a one-in-a-billion kind of thing? Are there enough life-friendly planets out there to make the search worthwhile?(See the Hubble telescope's greatest hits.)

Thanks to progress on all of these questions and more, scientists tend to be more confident than ever that life does exist out in the universe — and First Contact, a book by Washington Post reporter and editor Marc Kaufman, is a powerful reminder of why. Take Princeton geologist Tullis Onstott, whose story, along with those of many others, Kaufman tells. In 1996 Onstott ventured deep into a South African gold mine. Tapping into rock a mile (1.6 km) below the surface, he extracted bacteria that were living cheerfully in harsh conditions completely isolated from the rest of the biosphere.

Onstott's discovery is just one of dozens that established the existence of so-called extremophiles, bacteria and other forms of life that thrive in such absurdly hostile places as the hot springs in Yellowstone National Park, superheated water spewing from cracks in the bottom of the sea and environments laced with acid, heavy metals and even radioactive wastes. Life, in short, can deal with a much wider range of conditions than anyone thought — which means a distant planet needn't be a tropical paradise to be habitable.See the world's most influential people in the 2011 TIME 100

Or take Jeffrey Bada, a marine chemist at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, in La Jolla, Calif. Back in the 1950s, Bada's mentor, Stanley Miller, had probed the origin of life by passing electricity through a vial of organic chemicals to see what came out. Miller's published experiments were flawed. But Bada has re-examined some of Miller's unpublished ones and found intriguing hints that the origin of life may well be the rule on an Earth-like planet rather than the exception.(See the top 10 scientific discoveries of 2010.)

Kaufman also tackles the question of how many such planets are likely to exist. His lead character here is Paul Butler, now at the Carnegie Institution of Washington, who has been involved in scores of planet discoveries since the first so-called extrasolar planet was found in 1995. By Butler's estimation, as few as 5% of sunlike stars may host a habitable planet — but given that there are tens of billions of sunlike stars in the Milky Way alone, that's still a pretty big number. Butler, moreover, is hardly the only, or even the most accomplished, planet hunter in the business, and his estimates don't take into account the most recent discoveries by the Kepler space probe, which is finding planets by the bucketload.

Unfortunately, the most habitable planet found so far — a world known as Gliese 581g, announced by Butler and his colleague Steve Vogt last fall — is now widely believed not to exist after all. False detections are old news in the planet game, though, and Butler and Vogt appropriately noted at the time that their find would have to be confirmed by others before it could be considered rock solid.

The same applies to evidence of alien life, of course. Those claims have been made as well. It happened in 1996, for example, when scientists looked into a rock blasted from Mars to Earth and saw what they believed was evidence of fossilized bacteria, and earlier this year when an online journal announced a similar discovery in a meteorite that fell in the 1800s. In neither case were any real E.T. remains proved to exist. Back in the 1970s, the twin Viking probes landed on Mars and performed on-site tests of the soil, looking for life. Most came back negative, but one, designed by NASA scientist Gilbert Levin, showed suspicious activity.(See listening for aliens: what would E.T. do?)

In the end, Levin's colleagues, including Carl Sagan, decided it was a fluke — but Levin himself still insists it wasn't, and Kaufman is inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt. Kaufman also bends over backward for the folks who say that bacterial remains can be found in meteorites. "Research in the past decade into the worlds of extremophiles, microbes and fossils," he writes, "has proven that what's true today often is overturned tomorrow, and what's rejected today may be accepted tomorrow."

It's hard to fault Kaufman for thinking the glass is not just half full but nearly overflowing. Even if you limit your thinking to life as we know it — life based on the element carbon and dependent on liquid water for survival — the findings Kaufman writes about (and plenty he doesn't get to) all point to the notion that the Milky Way is likely teeming with biology.

And who's to say life as we know it is the only kind? Physicist Paul Davies has argued recently that the search for life is far too parochial, that alternate biologies could exist, literally under our noses, without our being aware of them. Researchers at Harvard's Origin of Life initiative, meanwhile, are considering the possibility of planets dominated by a sulfur cycle rather than the carbon cycle that prevails on our own planet — and are trying to fathom what sort of life could result. That would be life as we don't know it, but the Harvard group is starting to work out how we might detect it.

If they're right, Kaufman's claim that "before the end of this century, and perhaps much sooner than that, scientists will determine that life exists elsewhere in the universe" may actually be an understatement.

Royals: Will Wills and Kate Make Up for Charles and Di?

As the royal wedding approaches, I find myself thinking back to the other wedding 30 years ago that I helped cover as a young reporter in London and wondering from afar (in Iowa, where I now live) how the extravaganza on April 29 — and, beyond that ritual, the marriage of Prince William and Kate Middleton — will differ.

During the summer of 1981, all of England seemed to have wedding fever — even my socialist pals. And as an intern working in the London bureau of an American newspaper, I was swept up in the excitement of covering a big story in great detail — which is how I learned all about organza.

"So organza is the name of the designer?" was my clueless follow-up question during an interview with Lady so-and-so for a fashion story on what wedding guests would be wearing.(See 10 ways that William and Kate's wedding breaks the mold.)

"No, dear, it's the name of the fabric," the lady responded, turning fabric into a four-syllable word.

Still, as a 22-year-old Yank who couldn't imagine marrying, let alone into that family, I wondered if 20-year-old Diana Spencer knew what she was getting into. So did the feminists who distributed sadly prescient buttons that read, "Don't Do It Di." Lady Di seemed so young and naive. Prince Charles made me shudder, especially with his "Whatever love is" response to a reporter's question about whether the couple was in love.

Flash forward to Kate the commoner, who at 29 is an older bride than Diana was and surely wiser and worldlier. And William — a groom at 28, not 32 like Charles — surely has learned a thing or two from the horror-story marriage that followed his parents' fairytale wedding. Am I the only one, this time around, who is less pumped about the wedding but more optimistic about the marriage? Not judging from conversations with British and American friends. (All female. The guys I know claim to not give a hoot.)(See pictures of Kate Middleton's amazing fashion evolution.)

This is a couple who appear to have a relatively normal relationship, who've had rough patches over the years, who know that marriages can fail — and, in the case of Kate's parents, succeed (or at least endure). "They're going into it with their eyes wide open," observes Peggi, my 50-something hairstylist.

At the very least, the son of the People's Princess seems more certain than his dad about whatever love is. "Just compare the engagement photos," says my 26-year-old stepdaughter Emma, a single career gal in Chicago. On the face of it, the cuddly Wills-and-Kate pose is chillingly like the Charles-and-Di pose, down to Diana's engagement ring that Kate now wears. But William and Kate look like they like each other, my stepdaughter thinks. William's arms are wrapped snuggly, even protectively, around Kate.

My British friends report that this wedding is drawing less attention there than the 1981 wedding but is widely welcomed as a happy story, especially given all the other gloomy news (wars, uprisings, natural disasters, nuclear peril, economic belt-tightening). After the Charles-and-Di disaster, we may be less likely to believe in weddings stage-managed by Buckingham Palace. But we still want a happily-ever-after outcome for this attractive couple, especially this duty-bound young man who, as a boy, loved and lost his mother.(See an album of British royal weddings.)

Yet so much has changed since 1981. Today, the British monarchy seems like even more of an anachronism, notes my friend Merida, a London bureau friend now living in New York. And with all that's going on in the world, it's hard to imagine the press (or at least the "old media") committing the resources lavished on Charles and Diana's wedding. In 1981, thousands of Brits camped out along the wedding-procession route (prompting me to bunk in our bureau near Fleet Street the night before so I didn't have to fight the crowds during my morning commute).

Will they do the same this month on the "happy day," as Prime Minister David Cameron described it? Will many Brits again celebrate with neighborhood street parties? (My London friend Francine has been invited to an unusual bash — a republican, i.e., antimonarchist, lunch with red-colored food and no telly watching allowed.) Will Americans get up in the wee hours of the morning on April 29, 2011 — as many did on July 29, 1981 — to watch the wedding live on TV or, now, the Internet? Will we stock up on commemorative tchotchkes?(See the best royal-wedding souvenirs.)

I confess I want a little Wills-and-Kate plate. For years, a little Charles-and-Di plate has sat atop my bedroom dresser, beside a smaller plate marking Diana's 1997 death. What I don't think I want is a "Don't Do It Kate" button. So far, my London friends report there are none to be found.